OH s*** you are a deputy?? Don't hunt me down for confessing that I'm not a law abiding citizen. LOL! My father in law is a PO. He might already have dibs!brich75 wrote:I agree with what you are saying. I went out last weekend for the first time in 2 years.(since I became a deputy) I went to a popular place around Eugene. (the Rodeo) Seemed like every 15 minutes there was a fight or almost a fight its not just college kids either. There were 35 year old men in there looking for someone to make eye contact with them just so they could be tough. I quickly realized a couple things.ducklovinlady wrote:Well yes I did know the difference between right and wrong, but that doesn't mean I didn't make stupid choices in those periods of my life and now look back and think "THANK GOD I didn't get caught." Just because I wasn't caught, doesn't mean I didn't do things that I'm not proud of. I highly doubt there is a single person out there that doesn't have at least something they aren't proud of either.brich75 wrote:You didn't know the difference between right and wrong in High school? Or college for that matter? Don't get it twisted though, I am not one of the people wanting them booted. If found guilty I would be cool with them being punished the old fashioned way by running after practice till they puke.ducklovinlady wrote:I don't think your post is entirely correct. LMJ was not found guilty of a similiar crime. The only incident that has been reported was a 20 person fight with a rivalry football team in HS. Those charges were dropped.brich75 wrote:The thing that burns me is that he has had his chance already so has Lamike. They have both been found guilty of similar crimes and still got a chance to go to college and be stars. Yet didn't learn their lessons. Of course if they are found not guilty I will gladly eat my words.
But comeon, even if he WERE found guilty, we are now going to say "they didn't learn their lesson" for a high school fight??
If the courts order some community service or probation than that's fine. No need to jump the gun on them because the media says so!
However, I'm not going to declare a high school fight immoral and say that the person has had an opportunity to show they are above that. Comeon- high school and college is a highly violatile place. Alcohol flows, and fights break out. I'm not saying it's right, but I also don't think we need to look at the people that maybe participated in a physical fight as a "thug" (not that you called them that...some have though!). I don't know about you, but I have plenty of friends that I would be able to say are heathens for their actions. My husband even plays on a flag football team of GROWN adults and fights break out all the time. I doubt those guys will lose their jobs for that...
That being said, I do agree that athletes need to be smarter and make better choices to truly appreciate the gift they were given. As a one time student athlete myself, I can say I was highly disciplined in season, but off season (which is SHORT!) not so much. I kinda feel for some of these guys getting busted for underage drinking in the off season. Sure, it's against the law, but it's a ridiculous law to begin with. (By the way, I'm one of those people that sometimes talks on my cell phone while driving. Clearly, I have issues with laws.)
1. it definitely is not my scene anymore I got annoyed by everything, but that's probably because i was drinking ice water.
2. No matter how old you are when you drink you are the baddest man on the planet.
3. It's not just Oregon ducks that are drinking and driving. Or fighting with their girlfriends. I saw one drunk girl slap 3 different guys. One was right in front of a bouncer. She wasn't tossed out or even talked to about it.
4.
Masoli charged
Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1
- ducklovinlady
- Three Star Recruit
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:02 pm
Re: Masoli charged
- PDXShogun
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:18 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Masoli charged
Per George Schroeder, it looks like they are going to implement a more formalized conduct policy:
http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/si ... s-team.csp
felony charge=immediate suspension, felony conviction=gone. Hard to disagree with that.
Didn't mention what the penalty for a misdemeanor is, but assuming that is what LMJ is going to plea to, he'll most likely face some sort of suspension but will remain with the team. Masoli will probably be suspended pending the outcome of the trial. If guilty of a felony he's probably gone, if he is able to plea down to a misdemeanor he may face a similar penalty to James.
http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/si ... s-team.csp
felony charge=immediate suspension, felony conviction=gone. Hard to disagree with that.
Didn't mention what the penalty for a misdemeanor is, but assuming that is what LMJ is going to plea to, he'll most likely face some sort of suspension but will remain with the team. Masoli will probably be suspended pending the outcome of the trial. If guilty of a felony he's probably gone, if he is able to plea down to a misdemeanor he may face a similar penalty to James.
- MFRDuckFan
- Senior
- Posts: 4829
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Medford
Re: Masoli charged
^^ +1 ^^ We're just not under the microscope like these guys are and stuff happens when hormones, alcohol & stupidity take over. Just like you, most of us were lucky we didn't get caught.ducklovinlady wrote:Well yes I did know the difference between right and wrong, but that doesn't mean I didn't make stupid choices in those periods of my life and now look back and think "THANK GOD I didn't get caught." Just because I wasn't caught, doesn't mean I didn't do things that I'm not proud of. I highly doubt there is a single person out there that doesn't have at least something they aren't proud of either.brich75 wrote:You didn't know the difference between right and wrong in High school? Or college for that matter? Don't get it twisted though, I am not one of the people wanting them booted. If found guilty I would be cool with them being punished the old fashioned way by running after practice till they puke.ducklovinlady wrote:I don't think your post is entirely correct. LMJ was not found guilty of a similiar crime. The only incident that has been reported was a 20 person fight with a rivalry football team in HS. Those charges were dropped.brich75 wrote:The thing that burns me is that he has had his chance already so has Lamike. They have both been found guilty of similar crimes and still got a chance to go to college and be stars. Yet didn't learn their lessons. Of course if they are found not guilty I will gladly eat my words.
But comeon, even if he WERE found guilty, we are now going to say "they didn't learn their lesson" for a high school fight??
If the courts order some community service or probation than that's fine. No need to jump the gun on them because the media says so!
However, I'm not going to declare a high school fight immoral and say that the person has had an opportunity to show they are above that. Comeon- high school and college is a highly violatile place. Alcohol flows, and fights break out. I'm not saying it's right, but I also don't think we need to look at the people that maybe participated in a physical fight as a "thug" (not that you called them that...some have though!). I don't know about you, but I have plenty of friends that I would be able to say are heathens for their actions. My husband even plays on a flag football team of GROWN adults and fights break out all the time. I doubt those guys will lose their jobs for that...
That being said, I do agree that athletes need to be smarter and make better choices to truly appreciate the gift they were given. As a one time student athlete myself, I can say I was highly disciplined in season, but off season (which is SHORT!) not so much. I kinda feel for some of these guys getting busted for underage drinking in the off season. Sure, it's against the law, but it's a ridiculous law to begin with. (By the way, I'm one of those people that sometimes talks on my cell phone while driving. Clearly, I have issues with laws.)
I truly believe that there needs to be some off season program for these guys in order to keep them busy and focused. At least for next year, give it a try and maybe it will help with some of the boredom. This program cannot afford any more of these issues.
- MFRDuckFan
- Senior
- Posts: 4829
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Medford
Re: Masoli charged
It's best to have specific policies in place in order to take the pressure off of Chip having to vet this stuff out as it happens. His hands will be tied.PDXShogun wrote:Per George Schroeder, it looks like they are going to implement a more formalized conduct policy:
http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/si ... s-team.csp
felony charge=immediate suspension, felony conviction=gone. Hard to disagree with that.
Didn't mention what the penalty for a misdemeanor is, but assuming that is what LMJ is going to plea to, he'll most likely face some sort of suspension but will remain with the team. Masoli will probably be suspended pending the outcome of the trial. If guilty of a felony he's probably gone, if he is able to plea down to a misdemeanor he may face a similar penalty to James.
- brich75
- Senior
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:27 pm
-
RanDux
- Senior
- Posts: 2840
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:19 pm
- Location: Happy Valley, OR
Re: Masoli charged
Remember the site set up by his family proclaming his innocence? He apparently lied to them too. Sad.cordy02c wrote:there's a rumor on mops twitter that masoli lied to ck about his involvement
- ncduck
- Senior
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
- Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Re: Masoli charged
Allegedly.
-
maxduck
- Senior
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:37 pm
Re: Masoli charged
Maybe we can call it "school".MFRDuckFan wrote:I truly believe that there needs to be some off season program for these guys in order to keep them busy and focused. At least for next year, give it a try and maybe it will help with some of the boredom. This program cannot afford any more of these issues.
- MFRDuckFan
- Senior
- Posts: 4829
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:52 pm
- Location: Medford
Re: Masoli charged
Yeah, that doesn't seem to be working......maxduck wrote:Maybe we can call it "school".MFRDuckFan wrote:I truly believe that there needs to be some off season program for these guys in order to keep them busy and focused. At least for next year, give it a try and maybe it will help with some of the boredom. This program cannot afford any more of these issues.
-
mdm0302
- Freshman
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm
- Location: Eugene O
Re: Masoli charged
i keep hearing that masoli lied to chips face... does anyone know the details about that??
- shear_j
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:42 pm
- Location: Astoria/Klamath Falls OR
Re: Masoli charged
From what some people were saying on here, the athletic department knew knew what from day one. So I dont know where all of this "he lied" stuff is coming from.
All this hysteria is sending everyone in a panic and we just need to relax and let this run its course.
All this hysteria is sending everyone in a panic and we just need to relax and let this run its course.
-
duckgrad99
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6086
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Masoli charged
If we do lose Masoli, it would be a big blow. At the same time, it's just one season for him. Unfortunately it would be in a year where expectations are high, but I would much rather lose a player for one season than 2-4. Just my opinion, but I don't think it would necessarily set the program back. If anything, DT would just get more experience this season and be more prepared the following season.

- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 38935
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Masoli charged
Masoli possibly being off the team just speeds up DT's expected impact on the team.duckgrad99 wrote:If we do lose Masoli, it would be a big blow. At the same time, it's just one season for him. Unfortunately it would be in a year where expectations are high, but I would much rather lose a player for one season than 2-4. Just my opinion, but I don't think it would necessarily set the program back. If anything, DT would just get more experience this season and be more prepared the following season.

-
Destroyer77
- Five Star Recruit
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm
Re: Masoli charged
All law stuff aside, we will not be expected to win the Pac-10 without Masoli. Our ranking will also drop below top 10 nationally.
-
goducks75
- Four Star Recruit
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
- Location: Tigard/Eugene
Re: Masoli charged
True, but the same happened after the loss of Blount too. I think Chip and Helfrich will adjust the offense accordingly if need be. If DT is the guy then we will probably throw a lot more than we did with JM. Will take some adjusting but at least we have a manageable schedule to get used to it in the first half of the season. That 2nd half of the schedule is a killer though.Destroyer77 wrote:All law stuff aside, we will not be expected to win the Pac-10 without Masoli. Our ranking will also drop below top 10 nationally.
