RB Depth Chart

woundedknees · Post by **woundedknees** » Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:11 pm

Plus the WR reverses and sweeps that are probably in the offing, with the ridiculous amount of speed now available at that position...

karlhungis · Post by **karlhungis** » Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:33 pm

Mops wrote:
Anyone concerned about our RB depth like I am?

I am concerned as well. I wonder how well Blount will perform when he is the featured back.

wheaton4prez · Post by **wheaton4prez** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:02 am

Mops wrote:I've been thinking about this for a long time. It seems like Blount is easily the hands down favorite to be the #1 back at Oregon in the fall. However, after that it gets all crazy. Senior Andre Crenshaw has shown some flash and dash a few times while here. Alston is a bowling ball with legs, and freshman LaMichael James has potential just oozing out of him.

Yet, James is unproven, Alston has been injury prone, and Crenshaw has never lived up to the hype for a full game.

Anyone concerned about our RB depth like I am?

I think it's a definite area of need in recruiting. But, I like our RB depth for this year. Most of that hinges on my belief that Crenshaw is under-rated. He is one of the players I've predicted to make a surprise impact this year.

brich75 · Post by **brich75** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:10 am

wheaton4prez wrote:
Mops wrote:I've been thinking about this for a long time. It seems like Blount is easily the hands down favorite to be the #1 back at Oregon in the fall. However, after that it gets all crazy. Senior Andre Crenshaw has shown some flash and dash a few times while here. Alston is a bowling ball with legs, and freshman LaMichael James has potential just oozing out of him.

Yet, James is unproven, Alston has been injury prone, and Crenshaw has never lived up to the hype for a full game.

Anyone concerned about our RB depth like I am?
I think it's a definite area of need in recruiting. But, I like our RB depth for this year. Most of that hinges on my belief that Crenshaw is under-rated. He is one of the players I've predicted to make a surprise impact this year.

I hope your right about crenshaw, I dont think he is bad but i dont think he is a break out player. Again i hope im wrong!

karlhungis · Post by **karlhungis** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:36 am

brich75 wrote:
wheaton4prez wrote:
Mops wrote:I've been thinking about this for a long time. It seems like Blount is easily the hands down favorite to be the #1 back at Oregon in the fall. However, after that it gets all crazy. Senior Andre Crenshaw has shown some flash and dash a few times while here. Alston is a bowling ball with legs, and freshman LaMichael James has potential just oozing out of him.

Yet, James is unproven, Alston has been injury prone, and Crenshaw has never lived up to the hype for a full game.

Anyone concerned about our RB depth like I am?
I think it's a definite area of need in recruiting. But, I like our RB depth for this year. Most of that hinges on my belief that Crenshaw is under-rated. He is one of the players I've predicted to make a surprise impact this year.
I hope your right about crenshaw, I dont think he is bad but i dont think he is a break out player. Again i hope im wrong!

I agree. I haven't seen anything out of Crenshaw that is worth getting excited about. I think he will be a serviceable backup but I don't see the break out player in him.

gofightingducks · Post by **gofightingducks** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:44 am

I really think Crenshaw will step up and get close to a 1000 yards, I think the big reason he hasn't been a factor is because he hasn't been healthy and he has had to play behind JJ and J Stew.

midwestduck82 · Post by **midwestduck82** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:48 pm

gofightingducks wrote:I really think Crenshaw will step up and get close to a 1000 yards, I think the big reason he hasn't been a factor is because he hasn't been healthy and he has had to play behind JJ and J Stew.

I agree. He showed a lot of promise in 2007 with his elusiveness and agility. I think Crenshaw is going to be the number 2 guy this year. The real concern, that has been mentioned already, is what happens if Blount goes down. We do not have a true number one RB then, if we have one already. Our success this year depends on a multi-headed running attack that finds cohesion early, an increase in the level in play of our Oline from this spring, and the continuation of the passing attack that was around at the end of last year.

All in all, Oregon's O will continue to roll as it has since Chip came aboard. It is another year when everyone asks questions about the offense but the real question is can our defense hold.

woundedknees · Post by **woundedknees** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:36 pm

A lot of writers question how long Oregon can continue to be as productive as we have witnessed... The better question may be, "How many different ways can Chip Kelly tweak the offense to adjust for the personnel at hand?"

It's like having our own captive Mad Scientist.

What's cookin', Doc?

cmmadness · Post by **cmmadness** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:03 pm

Just my opinion, but it seems Crenshaw can't break a tackle to save his life. I know that Stewart was an anomoly, but watching Crenshaw briefly step in for him was just short of painful. To be honest, I think Alston will give Crenshaw a run for his money. Hoping for the best either way though.

uodux1212 · Post by **uodux1212** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:08 pm

Thinking about this really makes me appreciate JJ more and more... I think since he played behind JStew for almost his whole career he never really got the credit he deserved, when was the last time we worried about depth at RB? Its been a while... JStew goes down? We got JJ... Now if LGB goes down, we got (insert unproven RB here)??????? I really hope someone can step up, someone usually does...

GO DUCKS

Post by **UOducksTK1** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:17 pm

Mops wrote:Will Blount be able to improve on his speed and cut back agility? I bet he has, but my question is, is it enough to be a feature back?

Is it necessary that Blount is our feature back though?

Look at last season, or even a few seasons back. Blount-Johnson, Stewart-Johnson, Smith-Morris, etc... Some of our best years have been with 2 solid backs that bring something different to the table.

If a player like James or Alston can pick it up and bring that speed/cutting factor in to the game, then we don't need Blount to be an every down back.

lukeyrid13 · Post by **lukeyrid13** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:45 pm

I'm much more concerned about next years RB depth chart. It looks like this...

1. James
2. Alston 2
3. ..........? Yikes!!!

Hopefully it's this

1. James
2. Seastrunk
3. Lattimore
4. Grant
5. Alston

briarduck · Post by **briarduck** » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:14 am

lukeyrid13 wrote:I'm much more concerned about next years RB depth chart. It looks like this...

1. James
2. Alston 2
3. ..........? Yikes!!!

Hopefully it's this

1. James
2. Seastrunk
3. Lattimore
4. Grant
5. Alston

NICE! But don't forget...

6. Mack Brown

echo31 · Post by **echo31** » Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:17 am

I'm sure the coaches will do their best to bring in a really good JUCO RB for next year. Remember what our depth chart looked like before Blount came in?

gofightingducks · Post by **gofightingducks** » Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:29 am

I bet the Ducks take 3 RB's in this class, including a JUCO RB.

RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart

Re: RB Depth Chart