Re: RB Depth Chart
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:11 pm
Plus the WR reverses and sweeps that are probably in the offing, with the ridiculous amount of speed now available at that position...
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://www.ducksattack.com/forum/
I am concerned as well. I wonder how well Blount will perform when he is the featured back.Mops wrote:
Anyone concerned about our RB depth like I am?
I think it's a definite area of need in recruiting. But, I like our RB depth for this year. Most of that hinges on my belief that Crenshaw is under-rated. He is one of the players I've predicted to make a surprise impact this year.Mops wrote:I've been thinking about this for a long time. It seems like Blount is easily the hands down favorite to be the #1 back at Oregon in the fall. However, after that it gets all crazy. Senior Andre Crenshaw has shown some flash and dash a few times while here. Alston is a bowling ball with legs, and freshman LaMichael James has potential just oozing out of him.
Yet, James is unproven, Alston has been injury prone, and Crenshaw has never lived up to the hype for a full game.
Anyone concerned about our RB depth like I am?
I hope your right about crenshaw, I dont think he is bad but i dont think he is a break out player. Again i hope im wrong!wheaton4prez wrote:I think it's a definite area of need in recruiting. But, I like our RB depth for this year. Most of that hinges on my belief that Crenshaw is under-rated. He is one of the players I've predicted to make a surprise impact this year.Mops wrote:I've been thinking about this for a long time. It seems like Blount is easily the hands down favorite to be the #1 back at Oregon in the fall. However, after that it gets all crazy. Senior Andre Crenshaw has shown some flash and dash a few times while here. Alston is a bowling ball with legs, and freshman LaMichael James has potential just oozing out of him.
Yet, James is unproven, Alston has been injury prone, and Crenshaw has never lived up to the hype for a full game.
Anyone concerned about our RB depth like I am?
I agree. I haven't seen anything out of Crenshaw that is worth getting excited about. I think he will be a serviceable backup but I don't see the break out player in him.brich75 wrote:I hope your right about crenshaw, I dont think he is bad but i dont think he is a break out player. Again i hope im wrong!wheaton4prez wrote:I think it's a definite area of need in recruiting. But, I like our RB depth for this year. Most of that hinges on my belief that Crenshaw is under-rated. He is one of the players I've predicted to make a surprise impact this year.Mops wrote:I've been thinking about this for a long time. It seems like Blount is easily the hands down favorite to be the #1 back at Oregon in the fall. However, after that it gets all crazy. Senior Andre Crenshaw has shown some flash and dash a few times while here. Alston is a bowling ball with legs, and freshman LaMichael James has potential just oozing out of him.
Yet, James is unproven, Alston has been injury prone, and Crenshaw has never lived up to the hype for a full game.
Anyone concerned about our RB depth like I am?
I agree. He showed a lot of promise in 2007 with his elusiveness and agility. I think Crenshaw is going to be the number 2 guy this year. The real concern, that has been mentioned already, is what happens if Blount goes down. We do not have a true number one RB then, if we have one already. Our success this year depends on a multi-headed running attack that finds cohesion early, an increase in the level in play of our Oline from this spring, and the continuation of the passing attack that was around at the end of last year.gofightingducks wrote:I really think Crenshaw will step up and get close to a 1000 yards, I think the big reason he hasn't been a factor is because he hasn't been healthy and he has had to play behind JJ and J Stew.
Is it necessary that Blount is our feature back though?Mops wrote:Will Blount be able to improve on his speed and cut back agility? I bet he has, but my question is, is it enough to be a feature back?
NICE! But don't forget...lukeyrid13 wrote:I'm much more concerned about next years RB depth chart. It looks like this...
1. James
2. Alston 2
3. ..........? Yikes!!!
Hopefully it's this
1. James
2. Seastrunk
3. Lattimore
4. Grant
5. Alston![]()