Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

JB wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:

JB wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:Two top-5 players available on the trade market. Affirmative.

I’m torn between trying to contend, which I’m quire confident I can, or waiting another season.

I know this was probably a condescending comment, but as a new GM who do people think is the actual top 5-10 players in the league right now? Would help me out to see perceived value

Condescending? What?

Oh sorry, it's hard to read tone through text. I thought you were saying Spree isn't a top 5 guy. Which like, I don't think he is either.

No lol my comment had nothing to do with yours. (:

Craig wrote:

JB wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:Two top-5 players available on the trade market. Affirmative.

I’m torn between trying to contend, which I’m quire confident I can, or waiting another season.

I know this was probably a condescending comment, but as a new GM who do people think is the actual top 5-10 players in the league right now? Would help me out to see perceived value

Hmm I smell an article?

I’d rank

C
1. Shaq
2. Zo
3. Divac

Close:
Priest
Smits

PF:
1. DC
2. Duncan
3. KG

Close:
Toine
Vaught

SF:
1. Charles Smith
2. Jerome Lane
3. Chris Gatling

Close:
Manning
Webber

SG:
1. Q
2. MJ
3. Gill

Close:
Jim Jackson
Spree

PG:
1. KA
2. Penny
3. Iverson

Close:
GP
KJ

^ is this talent or value?

Talent I’d agree. Value I’d disagree. Rookie scale guys should be higher IMO

lukeyrid13 wrote:^ is they talent or value?

Talent I’d agree. Value I’d disagree. Rookie scale guys should be higher IMO

Only put PF of Duncan and Kg due to weaker position. But yeah they are just as equal as the rest. KG being able to play SF easily would put him higher but 4 Bpg in preseason as a rookie, called them equal.

Danny Manning is a beast

Overall it’s pretty dang close

Duncan stood out and then also no Kobe or Ray Allen. I think nuggets would trade MJ for those two in a heart beat

No one will take Barkley or Daughtery. But nice article. Some solid top 5 talent that is being shopped.

I'm assuming you decided my guys aren't on the market?

lukeyrid13 wrote:Overall it’s pretty dang close

Duncan stood out and then also no Kobe or Ray Allen. I think nuggets would trade MJ for those two in a heart beat

Definitely, neither gm would go for that lol

Cellar-door wrote:I'm assuming you decided my guys aren't on the market?

Are they? You said you wanted to compete, so the guys that are worth something in a trade market are off the table "unless you get blown away by an offer"

Foxyg1396 wrote:

Cellar-door wrote:I'm assuming you decided my guys aren't on the market?

Are they? You said you wanted to compete, so the guys that are worth something in a trade market are off the table "unless you get blown away by an offer"

Yeah I second this. When I read Hornets' block the impression it gives me is that a move is available if it's significantly advantageous for him. No offense Cellar, not calling you out, just kindly sharing how it's interpreted. (:

pistolpetejr wrote:

Foxyg1396 wrote:

Cellar-door wrote:I'm assuming you decided my guys aren't on the market?

Are they? You said you wanted to compete, so the guys that are worth something in a trade market are off the table "unless you get blown away by an offer"

Yeah I second this. When I read Hornets' block the impression it gives me is that a move is available if it's significantly advantageous for him. No offense Cellar, not calling you out, just kindly sharing how it's interpreted. (:

No that's basically true, just that I posted it after this came out. I shopped them more before TC, but nobody really showed much interest, probably waiting to see if they dropped.

jibbajabba614 wrote:

Craig wrote:

JB wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:Two top-5 players available on the trade market. Affirmative.

I’m torn between trying to contend, which I’m quire confident I can, or waiting another season.

I know this was probably a condescending comment, but as a new GM who do people think is the actual top 5-10 players in the league right now? Would help me out to see perceived value

Hmm I smell an article?

I’d rank

C
1. Shaq
2. Zo
3. Divac

Close:
Priest
Smits

PF:
1. DC
2. Duncan
3. KG

Close:
Toine
Vaught

SF:
1. Charles Smith
2. Jerome Lane
3. Chris Gatling

Close:
Manning
Webber

SG:
1. Q
2. MJ
3. Gill

Close:
Jim Jackson
Spree

PG:
1. KA
2. Penny
3. Iverson

Close:
GP
KJ

I think I'd have Jim Jackson number 1 in the entire league

JB wrote:

jibbajabba614 wrote:

Craig wrote:

JB wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:Two top-5 players available on the trade market. Affirmative.

I’m torn between trying to contend, which I’m quire confident I can, or waiting another season.

I know this was probably a condescending comment, but as a new GM who do people think is the actual top 5-10 players in the league right now? Would help me out to see perceived value

Hmm I smell an article?

I’d rank

C
1. Shaq
2. Zo
3. Divac

Close:
Priest
Smits

PF:
1. DC
2. Duncan
3. KG

Close:
Toine
Vaught

SF:
1. Charles Smith
2. Jerome Lane
3. Chris Gatling

Close:
Manning
Webber

SG:
1. Q
2. MJ
3. Gill

Close:
Jim Jackson
Spree

PG:
1. KA
2. Penny
3. Iverson

Close:
GP
KJ

I think I'd have Jim Jackson number 1 in the entire league

Between him and Q, far too many turnovers.

pistolpetejr wrote:

JB wrote:

jibbajabba614 wrote:

Craig wrote:

JB wrote:

pistolpetejr wrote:Two top-5 players available on the trade market. Affirmative.

I’m torn between trying to contend, which I’m quire confident I can, or waiting another season.

I know this was probably a condescending comment, but as a new GM who do people think is the actual top 5-10 players in the league right now? Would help me out to see perceived value

Hmm I smell an article?

I’d rank

C
1. Shaq
2. Zo
3. Divac

Close:
Priest
Smits

PF:
1. DC
2. Duncan
3. KG

Close:
Toine
Vaught

SF:
1. Charles Smith
2. Jerome Lane
3. Chris Gatling

Close:
Manning
Webber

SG:
1. Q
2. MJ
3. Gill

Close:
Jim Jackson
Spree

PG:
1. KA
2. Penny
3. Iverson

Close:
GP
KJ

I think I'd have Jim Jackson number 1 in the entire league

Between him and Q, far too many turnovers.

Yeah really just helping out a fellow GM who wants to do that article.

Honestly I didn’t do any research on that. Just off top of my head. Gathers is another guy too

pistolpetejr wrote:

Foxyg1396 wrote:

Cellar-door wrote:I'm assuming you decided my guys aren't on the market?

Are they? You said you wanted to compete, so the guys that are worth something in a trade market are off the table "unless you get blown away by an offer"

Yeah I second this. When I read Hornets' block the impression it gives me is that a move is available if it's significantly advantageous for him. No offense Cellar, not calling you out, just kindly sharing how it's interpreted. (:

Same thoughts ^