Pac-12 not dead yet
Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1
- UOducksTK1
- Site Admin

- Posts: 40537
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
- GM: Boston Celtics GM
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
The American conference is gonna be in shambles if Tulsa, Memphis, and UTSA leave. Some FCS conferences are more interesting.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4516
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
The Mountain West is currently subsidizing travel to and from Hawaii for MWC schools. It's doubtful that the New Pac would do the same. UNLV, Wyoming, Air Force, Nevada, UTSA, and Tulane would be logical choices for a 12-team conference. An influx of TV revenue could significantly improve some of these schools. It's an interesting consideration.greenyellow wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 2:21 pm I could see them adding UTSA to get into Texas and maybe UNLV to get the Vegas market. If they wanted, they could probably get Hawaii cheap since they're not full MWC members.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39213
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
UNLV is now 2-0 against Big 12 teams this season as they've beaten Houston in Week 1 and now Kansas in Week 3. They might have an argument for being included.

- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
They're also a nationally recognized brand from their glory days in basketball and add a better market than most schools. They're not a bad consolation, if needed.greenyellow wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:39 pm UNLV is now 2-0 against Big 12 teams this season as they've beaten Houston in Week 1 and now Kansas in Week 3. They might have an argument for being included.
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
Blurb I read said that much like the CA school system, if you want UNLV you may have to take Nevada too or else it may not get approved.StevensTechU wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 10:27 pmThey're also a nationally recognized brand from their glory days in basketball and add a better market than most schools. They're not a bad consolation, if needed.greenyellow wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:39 pm UNLV is now 2-0 against Big 12 teams this season as they've beaten Houston in Week 1 and now Kansas in Week 3. They might have an argument for being included.

-
buckmarkduck
- All-American
- Posts: 11000
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
I seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventuallyOregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
- Alan
- Senior
- Posts: 4359
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 2:17 pm
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
I am assuming the new PAC 8, with the additional two schools added, would be a power five conference?buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:04 amI seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventuallyOregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
-
buckmarkduck
- All-American
- Posts: 11000
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
I doubt that will be the case. In fact I fully expect the SEC/BIG to negotiate that the Big 12 doesn’t have a automatic bid next negotiation.Alan wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:19 amI am assuming the new PAC 8, with the additional two schools added, would be a power five conference?buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:04 amI seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventuallyOregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
The pac 8 will bring very small fan bases, no major markets, and no schools that recruit in the top 30 or show any real NIL to change that. They will get a far smaller tv deal than the orginal pac 12 walked away from, meaning they will have 20% of the money the sec and BIg get for TV. No way will anyone agree to give those schools an automatic bid when this current deal runs out.
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4516
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
Maybe they should invite San Jose State, Utah State, New Mexico State and Florida State
so every team would be a something STATE.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
- nogerO
- Senior
- Posts: 4516
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
I've said this before, there will ultimately be either two super conferences of 24 teams or one super conference of 48. The rest of the teams will be 1-A, a 48 team conference and play for a different championship. Everybody else is FCC. It's all about the $$$. It will happen, it's just a matter of time.buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:30 amI doubt that will be the case. In fact I fully expect the SEC/BIG to negotiate that the Big 12 doesn’t have a automatic bid next negotiation.Alan wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:19 amI am assuming the new PAC 8, with the additional two schools added, would be a power five conference?buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:04 amI seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventuallyOregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
The pac 8 will bring very small fan bases, no major markets, and no schools that recruit in the top 30 or show any real NIL to change that. They will get a far smaller tv deal than the orginal pac 12 walked away from, meaning they will have 20% of the money the sec and BIg get for TV. No way will anyone agree to give those schools an automatic bid when this current deal runs out.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine
- Duck07
- All-American
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
Not a chance as it looks entirely like they're trying to angle for being the top G5 conference and essentially earn an auto-bid from being the "better" football conference.Alan wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:19 amI am assuming the new PAC 8, with the additional two schools added, would be a power five conference?buckmarkduck wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:04 amI seriously doubt Stanford, or even Cal, have any interest in being in a conference with Boise Junior College. And it was Stanford/Cal who refused to let any Cal State schools in forever. They will probably end up in the big 12 or independent eventuallyOregonFan4Life wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 8:43 am I wonder if they will try and get Stanford and Cal back. I don’t know the details but I thought their contract with the ACC wasn’t good and the travel is rough for Cal and Stanford.
The new pac is just the MWC, with OSU/WSU as your anchor schools. Doesn’t seem like a better long term conference than the MWC or AAC.
They probably need to take the 6 they have now and make a "West" Division and then go find another 6 to make an "East" Division like Memphis, Tulane, SMU, UTSA and others.

- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
SMU is in the ACC, so I think they're out.
There was some clowning on OSU's messageboard on twitter because someone said the gap between the new Pac and the Big 12 was minimal. I honestly don't think that's that strong of a take. Utah and Oklahoma State are tops in the Big 12 and they're not exactly teams that Oregon State, Wazzu, Boise and Fresno would be outclassed by in most years.
There was some clowning on OSU's messageboard on twitter because someone said the gap between the new Pac and the Big 12 was minimal. I honestly don't think that's that strong of a take. Utah and Oklahoma State are tops in the Big 12 and they're not exactly teams that Oregon State, Wazzu, Boise and Fresno would be outclassed by in most years.
- pezsez1
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 6271
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
- Location: RIP CITY
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
That might have been me who said that!There was some clowning on OSU's messageboard on twitter because someone said the gap between the new Pac and the Big 12 was minimal.
My comment was in the context of why rebuilding the Pac was probably OSU's (and WSU's) best option. By taking the top half of the MW, adding two Power 4-tier programs, and bringing in a couple other top-tier G5 teams, the new Pac will probably be on par talent-wise with the Big 12, and it could end up with a de-facto automatic playoff berth. Still not ideal, and I'm sure OSU would have left WSU in a burning building for a Big 12 bid, but it is what it is and it could be worse.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
- StevensTechU
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 7116
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
- Location: Hoboken, NJ
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
Articles being written that Air Force could be going to the AAC. That means they're unlikely to be picked up by the Beavs and Cougs, and could indicate that the AAC expects some attrition (Tulane, Memphis, and UTSA all targets for Pac).
- greenyellow
- Moderator

- Posts: 39213
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
- Location: Eugene, OR
Re: Pac-12 not dead yet
Rough day for the Pac-12 as they got turned down by USF, UTSA, Tulane, and Memphis from the AAC and then the MWC used the Pac-12's own money against them to retain UNLV, AF, SJSU, and Nevada. Only addition was Utah State but rumors are the Pac-12 may look to add Gonzaga as a full-member even without football.
Edit: With both conferences at 7 teams, it now looks like UNLV is considering the Pac-12's offer again.
Edit: With both conferences at 7 teams, it now looks like UNLV is considering the Pac-12's offer again.
