Ducks Attack Message Board Forum

Phenom wrote:The admiral doe...

And I worked to bring him down from what the file originally had.

Honestly though, in real life he put up exactly what Ewing did here. 25, 12 and 4 blocks as a rookie. He is only a year younger than Hakeem though so while he'll be cheaper, he is going to be like 24-25 and not have as many TC's to improve. I would personally say though that he should have equal value to EWing and only Hakeem has more value IMO.

lukeyrid13 wrote:Lithuania and Yugoslavia had almost all of the talent. Sabonis, Marciulunas, Divac, Petrovic etc

1988 Gold medal Seoul squad:

C: Sabonis- Lithuania
PF: Tikhonenko- Uzbekistan
SF: Šarūnas Marčiulionis - Lithuania
SG: Rimas Kurtinaitis- Lithuania
PG: Tiit Sokk - Estonia

Bench:
PF/C:Goborov-Ukraine
PG/SG: Valdemaras Chomičius- Lithuania
SG: Igors Miglinieks- Latvia
PF: Sergei Tarakanov - USSR
SF/PF: Alexander Volkov- Ukraine
C:Viktor Pankrashkin- USSR

4 Lithuania
2 Ukraine
2 USSR
1 Uzbek
1 Latvia
1 Estonia

None of the starters were from the USSR.

I'm so lost with who to draft :-/

Top 3 are Robinson, then Drazen or Sabas depending on your style or team need. Beyond that it is really hard.

Zyme wrote:Top 3 are Robinson, then Drazen or Sabas depending on your style or team need. Beyond that it is really hard.

Ya, it's rough. Guess just gotta hope for the lottery Jackpot. I was surprised to see Glenn Rice wasn't a better scorer.

pudgejeff wrote:

Zyme wrote:Top 3 are Robinson, then Drazen or Sabas depending on your style or team need. Beyond that it is really hard.

Ya, it's rough. Guess just gotta hope for the lottery Jackpot. I was surprised to see Glenn Rice wasn't a better scorer.

With Drazen in there I really didn't see need to put in another volume scorer. Cliffy could probably develop into a top 2 option for a team.

Zyme wrote:

pudgejeff wrote:

Zyme wrote:Top 3 are Robinson, then Drazen or Sabas depending on your style or team need. Beyond that it is really hard.

Ya, it's rough. Guess just gotta hope for the lottery Jackpot. I was surprised to see Glenn Rice wasn't a better scorer.

With Drazen in there I really didn't see need to put in another volume scorer. Cliffy could probably develop into a top 2 option for a team.

I guess I wasn't thinking about need, just of what they were coming into the league and he was a top scorer. Isn't that what they're supposed to be as they first come in?

Hopefully I can chance into a PG.

pudgejeff wrote:

Zyme wrote:

pudgejeff wrote:

Zyme wrote:Top 3 are Robinson, then Drazen or Sabas depending on your style or team need. Beyond that it is really hard.

Ya, it's rough. Guess just gotta hope for the lottery Jackpot. I was surprised to see Glenn Rice wasn't a better scorer.

With Drazen in there I really didn't see need to put in another volume scorer. Cliffy could probably develop into a top 2 option for a team.

I guess I wasn't thinking about need, just of what they were coming into the league and he was a top scorer. Isn't that what they're supposed to be as they first come in?

His per 36 didn't get good for a couple of years. I've tried to get them close, though with some variation.

Hardaway and Rice seemed low on the outside scoring to me.

Drazen was easily the best scorer/player out of all of the guards. So I don't necessarily have a problem with how the other guys are ranked.

Boom wrote:Drazen was easily the best scorer/player out of all of the guards. So I don't necessarily have a problem with how the other guys are ranked.

Hardaway put up 23 and 10 his second season

lukeyrid13 wrote:Hardaway and Rice seemed low on the outside scoring to me.

I agree.

lukeyrid13 wrote:

Boom wrote:Drazen was easily the best scorer/player out of all of the guards. So I don't necessarily have a problem with how the other guys are ranked.

Hardaway put up 23 and 10 his second season

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dra%C5%BEen_Petrovi%C4%87
Petro, as the Americans had dubbed him, averaged 20.6 points in 36.9 minutes on the floor, nearly leading all NBA guards in field goal percentage (51%). He did not miss a single game; he established himself as the team leader; and he was named team MVP. More significantly, his success translated into team success, as the Nets recorded 14 more wins than the season before and made the playoffs. The following, 1992–93 season, Petrović increased his scoring average (22.3, 11th best that season) and repeated his three-point field goal percentage from the previous season (45%), again nearly leading all guards in field goal percentage (52%)

His field goal percentages were crazy good.