Re: CFP Playoff Rankings
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2025 1:35 pm
I also have a feeling that the committee is going to put Miami in as the last at-large team over Notre Dame due to their head to head win in week 1.
Oregon Ducks Sports Message Board Forum
https://www.ducksattack.com/forum/
If it comes down to Notre Dame and Miami for the final spot, my guess is they'll pick Notre Dame for no other reason other than tv viewershippdxduck2013 wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 1:35 pm I also have a feeling that the committee is going to put Miami in as the last at-large team over Notre Dame due to their head to head win in week 1.
It would make the most sense, but just imagine the tantrums the SEC will throw if both Texas and Alabama are left outPhalanx wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 2:11 pm Notre Dame is on a 10-game winning streak.
Miami is on a 4-game winning streak.
I know it is premature, but if Alabama loses, they will have lost 2 of their last 4 games. Is that a team that needs to go to the playoffs to see if they are the best team in the country? Doesn't it seem like a third loss would more or less demonstrate that they aren't? If I am the committee, I am rooting for an Alabama loss. It's the cleanest scenario at this point to leave them and take the two teams on winning streaks.
It's almost like the schools were all warned that adding more quality teams was going to dilute their records by 1-2 more losses every year. Also why seeing them play 9 conference games will make these future meltdowns even funnier when they're arguing for 4-5 loss teams to get in.squintsdd wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 3:01 pmIt would make the most sense, but just imagine the tantrums the SEC will throw if both Texas and Alabama are left outPhalanx wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 2:11 pm Notre Dame is on a 10-game winning streak.
Miami is on a 4-game winning streak.
I know it is premature, but if Alabama loses, they will have lost 2 of their last 4 games. Is that a team that needs to go to the playoffs to see if they are the best team in the country? Doesn't it seem like a third loss would more or less demonstrate that they aren't? If I am the committee, I am rooting for an Alabama loss. It's the cleanest scenario at this point to leave them and take the two teams on winning streaks.
It's getting sickening. We've all grown up living through East Coast bias, but I would gladly take ignorant bias over this outright cheerleading.Bigwaved wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 5:23 pm The commentators for the SEC game just educated everyone on how every team in the SEC is the best ever fielded, so their losses are actually wins. Meanwhile, the BIG10 has three good teams and that is it. A cakewalk to play in that conference.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Followed by the Southeastern Cult commissioner saying that 7 SEC teams deserved being in the playoffs.Bigwaved wrote:The commentators for the SEC game just educated everyone on how every team in the SEC is the best ever fielded, so their losses are actually wins. Meanwhile, the BIG10 has three good teams and that is it. A cakewalk to play in that conference.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
These are the teams being discussed for the last spot.Everythingsducky wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:55 pm If Bama gets in and Vandy doesn’t, heads need to roll on the selection committee.
Hard to tell, depends on who you’d rather see. Given how this game played out not sure I want to see Indiana again, though maybe our coaching staff was able to learn a thing or two from their first matchup and they won’t have the same struggles in a rematch. Ohio State is more talented but Indiana has a solid system and our coaching staff has done very poor in rematches.pezsez1 wrote:Is it better for us if Ohio State or Indiana wins?