Page 1 of 2
Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:46 pm
by UOducksTK1
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:47 pm
by UOducksTK1
2-5, good sim for us. We should end up with a talk pick this year, at the rate we are losing.
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:52 pm
by Zyme
The hell, that looked like a college box score:
http://ducksattack.com/DASL/boxes/54-1.html
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:57 pm
by dd10snoop28
First healthy sim and we go 9-0..... then Fat Lever gets injured. Love having Gminski come off the bench.
Pretty awesome when you win and your 2 leading scorers are bench players:
Mike Gminski PF 29 7 16 0 0 7 7 8 2 2 0 1 0 21
John Williams SF 14 4 6 0 0 8 9 3 2 1 1 1 0 16
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:04 pm
by UOducksTK1
It's never good when your top two scorers have more shot attempts than points, which was the case for me that game lol.
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:09 pm
by Zyme
UOducksTK1 wrote:
It's never good when your top two scorers have more shot attempts than points, which was the case for me that game lol.
34% and 31 %. Lets play, who doesn't want to win a basketball game.........!
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:13 pm
by Phenom
I'm beating who I'm supposed to beat.
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:16 pm
by cordy02c
4-2 wow how did that happen
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:33 pm
by tales
Bleh 3-3. Armstrong has been really struggling since I changed the pace..
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:36 pm
by UOducksTK1
cordy02c wrote:4-2 wow how did that happen
Like I said, no way one earth Hinson shouldn't be starting. He's played well, and your box scores have looked much better since he was benched..
http://ducksattack.com/DASL/boxes/53-7.html (good D and had a solid game)
http://ducksattack.com/DASL/boxes/49-4.html another strong game
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:35 pm
by FlDuckFan
Not to bad .500 still on the outside looking in though.
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:30 pm
by Goose!
Changed my trap from normal to sometimes; my bigs get in to foul trouble against the good teams and then we lose to them.
Team has been performing well after I traded away Harper, Laimbeer, and Moncrief, we've jumped from 7th seed to 3rd since then.
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:46 pm
by Brophdog88
wow.....I dont get it
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:56 pm
by FlDuckFan
Goose! wrote:Changed my trap from normal to sometimes; my bigs get in to foul trouble against the good teams and then we lose to them.
Team has been performing well after I traded away Harper, Laimbeer, and Moncrief, we've jumped from 7th seed to 3rd since then.
I was in a pretty big hole and Laimbeer & Moncrief have been helping to get out. Moncrief is pulling better numbers for me than Alvin did so looks like it helped us both. ( you a little more) Only bad thing about this sim for me was Drazen went for 56! and I lost by 3 ..
Re: Sim 9 Discussion (Days 46-55)
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:18 pm
by Goose!
FlDuckFan wrote:Goose! wrote:Changed my trap from normal to sometimes; my bigs get in to foul trouble against the good teams and then we lose to them.
Team has been performing well after I traded away Harper, Laimbeer, and Moncrief, we've jumped from 7th seed to 3rd since then.
I was in a pretty big hole and Laimbeer & Moncrief have been helping to get out. Moncrief is pulling better numbers for me than Alvin did so looks like it helped us both. ( you a little more) Only bad thing about this sim for me was Drazen went for 56! and I lost by 3 ..
Yeah, I've been keeping track on both of them. Never seen Moncrief put up a 20/10 game before, glad he's doing well for you. Alvin's not doing better statistically, but he's been of huge help with his defense and passing; but yeah, it's just a matter of who fits better on your team.