Page 1 of 1
Pac-10 unit rankings (rivals)
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:46 pm
by UOducksTK1
Re: Pac-10 unit rankings (rivals)
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:01 pm
by freedjr
My guess is it's just the turnover. Chip, Helfrich, Azzinaro taking new responsibilities and Pflu gone. I think it's deserved, but I think it will be adjusted accordingly next year.
On a bright note, I heard on the radio this morning Helfrich is doing a helluva job. That makes me happy because I really haven't heard anything about him, good or bad.
Re: Pac-10 unit rankings (rivals)
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:10 pm
by buckmarkduck
I would bet our LB's at oline will end up being in the top 2-3 by the time the season is over. Also I like our WR better than #6 in the pac-10, but they just have to get healthy and show it.
Re: Pac-10 unit rankings (rivals)
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:12 pm
by UOducksTK1
buckmarkduck wrote:I would bet our LB's at oline will end up being in the top 2-3 by the time the season is over. Also I like our WR better than #6 in the pac-10, but they just have to get healthy and show it.
5th is pretty low for LBs considering the talent we have. But the pac-10's LB groups are stacked this year.
Re: Pac-10 unit rankings (rivals)
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:42 pm
by duck55
Funny how we average out at or below 5th yet we are prjected to be in the top 3
Re: Pac-10 unit rankings (rivals)
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:19 pm
by monster
Oregon's not getting much credit here.
Offensive backfield: #2? I know Best is fast, but Oregon has lead the Pac in rushing for 3 or 4 consecutive years. Until that changes, #2 is a snub.
Judging from the rest of these, the Ducks would be lucky to finish in the top 5.