Page 1 of 2

Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 1:06 am
by lukeyrid13
Screen Shot 2021-05-16 at 1.02.30 AM.png
Screen Shot 2021-05-16 at 1.03.45 AM.png

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 1:25 am
by offtheheezy
This is a fun series - I think your recent FA experiences have you penalizing expiring contracts too much though :lol:. Would take Jordan 1st even as an expiring just due to age.

Thanks for the article!

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 9:38 am
by UOducksTK1
My whole team almost dropped out of the rankings, haha

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 9:43 am
by lukeyrid13
offtheheezy wrote:This is a fun series - I think your recent FA experiences have you penalizing expiring contracts too much though :lol:. Would take Jordan 1st even as an expiring just due to age.

Thanks for the article!
Well I certainly wouldn't trade him for the guy who is ranked 2nd. I think Robinson as a rookie probably true does have more value. Moses is getting up there in age, so true value, MJ is higher. But Moses is at least locked in while MJ is not.

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 9:46 am
by The Bean Regime
Timberwolves finally made an article! Suck it losers! :lol:

Curious to see if Bias can reclaim a spot next time. Hasn't taken much of a leap forward from last season but he's still quite good and is only a sophomore.

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 9:53 am
by lukeyrid13
UOducksTK1 wrote:My whole team almost dropped out of the rankings, haha

Really rough start for your guys this season. Perkins seems to have stagnated and is now expiring. Benjamin I think declined a bit. Scott is and will be good, he's still top 20 with some absolute studs. You added McHale who is good....but 25 teams wouldn't even want him so his trade value doesn't reflect his on court production.

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 9:57 am
by lukeyrid13
The Bean Regime wrote:Timberwolves finally made an article! Suck it losers! :lol:

Curious to see if Bias can reclaim a spot next time. Hasn't taken much of a leap forward from last season but he's still quite good and is only a sophomore.
I did drop it from a top 50 to a top 40 so that affects it a bit.

But Bias appears to be a 1 dimensional player as an inside scorer but doesn't provide other valuable tools to his game. He could still blow up and become a 22-25ppg game similar to like an Adrian Dantley but didn't show much progress from year 1 to year 2.

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 12:25 pm
by dd10snoop28
Agree with mostly everything. nice job.

I think Mitchell Jordan is 4 PG's too low. Should be behind Leon Wood.

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 1:35 pm
by the goat
The three ball is hot right now, but beefy big men still reign supreme... I'd go

1. Moses
1A. Sampson/ Hakeem/ JBC
2. Tarpley / Admiral

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 1:37 pm
by Foxyg1396
the goat wrote:1. Moses
1A. Sampson/ Hakeem/ JBC
2. Tarpley / Admiral
That’s an interesting take on things for sure.

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 10:19 pm
by lukeyrid13
dd10snoop28 wrote:Agree with mostly everything. nice job.

I think Mitchell Jordan is 4 PG's too low. Should be behind Leon Wood.
You wouldn't trade him for rookie Mark Jackson?

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 10:51 am
by Craig
lukeyrid13 wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:Agree with mostly everything. nice job.

I think Mitchell Jordan is 4 PG's too low. Should be behind Leon Wood.
You wouldn't trade him for rookie Mark Jackson?
Are we sure he shouldn't be on par with Wood? Could be small sample size but Jordan looks legit.

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 11:27 am
by lukeyrid13
Craig wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:
dd10snoop28 wrote:Agree with mostly everything. nice job.

I think Mitchell Jordan is 4 PG's too low. Should be behind Leon Wood.
You wouldn't trade him for rookie Mark Jackson?
Are we sure he shouldn't be on par with Wood? Could be small sample size but Jordan looks legit.
Since Jordan has been in the league for several years now, I didn't realize he was still only 22. He has C potential, but he is pretty stinking good.

He's only 5'8 as well, but at 207 pounds and C- rebounding, he's not as deficient as most small PG are.

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Tue May 25, 2021 4:17 pm
by Oregon Ownage
Post your preferences

Re: Top 40 Trade Value

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 9:23 am
by lukeyrid13
Ken Barlow
Inside scoring
Strength

Michael Jordan
Strength