Page 1 of 2

nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 9:42 pm
by dd10snoop28
Olden Polynice
Horace Grant
Thurl Bailey
Blazers top 10 protected 1st in 1089
orlando woolridge
for
Tim Kempton
Tom Chambers

correct me if I got anything wrong, boom.

accept

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 9:47 pm
by vincent1469
First blockbuster of the offseason

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 9:54 pm
by offtheheezy
I really like Polynice and Grant. Is a pretty decent haul for Chambers. Rockets starting a rebuild a year early? They don’t have their first this year, but I guess this package was better than what they thought they could get

Perfect for Nets :lol: Blazers should be happy

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 9:57 pm
by The Bean Regime
Not sure how to feel about this one. Nets did just win the ship so on the surface adding a great player in Chambers makes sense. However, they did JUST win the ship. Does it makes sense to sacrifice that many future assets for an older player like Chambers when you're already best of the best? Nets must have been really unimpressed with the rookie duo.

Makes sense for the Rockets. Their title picture is over with Parish being 35 and Dantley 33. It's a good rebuilding offer.

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 9:59 pm
by offtheheezy
The Bean Regime wrote:Not sure how to feel about this one. Nets did just win the ship so on the surface adding a great player in Chambers makes sense. However, they did JUST win the ship. Does it makes sense to sacrifice that many future assets for an older player like Chambers when you're already best of the best? Nets must have been really unimpressed with the rookie duo.

Makes sense for the Rockets. Their title picture is over with Parish being 35 and Dantley 33. It's a good rebuilding offer.
Chances of Nets retaining Pierce this offseason with all that unnecessary max cap and no bird rights was pretty low. Took two young potential guys out of the rotation for a better wing replacement on Pierce lets them stay elite I’d say

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:10 pm
by dd10snoop28
ya really like polynice/grant. probably could've held them another year but didn't want to risk a mediocre tc (maybe poor rationale) and them decrease value.

chambers wasn't my ideal target due to his contract but gives me an opportunity to win again next yr if I lose pierce.

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:37 pm
by dd10snoop28
thegoat refused to trade Griffith to me. that was my main target

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2021 10:50 pm
by lukeyrid13
offtheheezy wrote:I really like Polynice and Grant. Is a pretty decent haul for Chambers. Rockets starting a rebuild a year early? They don’t have their first this year, but I guess this package was better than what they thought they could get

Perfect for Nets :lol: Blazers should be happy
I mean it clearly shows the Nets are scared of the rematch next year

Also, the Nets GM admits in this thread that he can't develop talent so he again needs to pilfer from someone else.

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:08 am
by Boom
Accept

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:15 am
by Boom
dd10snoop28 wrote:Olden Polynice
Horace Grant
Thurl Bailey
Blazers top 10 protected 1st in 1089
for
Tim Kempton
Tom Chambers

correct me if I got anything wrong, boom.

accept
Missing Woolridge?

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2021 7:56 am
by dd10snoop28
yup, added woolridge now.

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2021 3:05 pm
by Oregon Ownage
Bold move so I applaud the Nets for making it

Rockets get a great return and if one the prospects turn into something, its a win for them

Done

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:08 am
by UOducksTK1
So we are allowed to trade firsts nearly 1000 years in the past?

I guess Nets can do anything these days and get away with it..

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:20 am
by lukeyrid13
UOducksTK1 wrote:So we are allowed to trade firsts nearly 1000 years in the past?

I guess Nets can do anything these days and get away with it..
:lol: :lol: And the Nets are supposedly an accountant.

I’ll trade my 322 BC 1st for a PG

Re: nets/rockets

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:23 am
by Foxyg1396
UOducksTK1 wrote:So we are allowed to trade firsts nearly 1000 years in the past?

I guess Nets can do anything these days and get away with it..
Only a witch could trade a 1st from that long ago