Page 1 of 1

Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 12:35 pm
by UOducksTK1

Re: Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 12:59 pm
by greenyellow
I say we are on the bubble at this point and a sweep would only help to move us off the bubble and be a sure shot at being a regional host.

Re: Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:02 pm
by duckgrad99
I would guess that Oregon wouldn't host a regional, especially since Arizona State and UCLA almost definitely will.

Re: Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:55 pm
by r2fireduck
duckgrad99 wrote:I would guess that Oregon wouldn't host a regional, especially since Arizona State and UCLA almost definitely will.
Even more than this, Arkansas beat Vanderbilt last weekend at Nashville. More than likely they will get the regional that was up for our grabs.

Re: Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 5:12 pm
by greenyellow
It's very hard to see the NCAA giving 3 Pac-10 teams regional hosting bids while there are other highly ranked schools that would help spread out the Tournament instead of consolidating it on the West Coast.

Re: Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 6:09 pm
by oregontrack
greenyellow wrote:It's very hard to see the NCAA giving 3 Pac-10 teams regional hosting bids while there are other highly ranked schools that would help spread out the Tournament instead of consolidating it on the West Coast.
I disagree. 3 host schools from the #1 or #2 ranked conference in the country is not far fetched at all.

Re: Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 6:11 pm
by r2fireduck
greenyellow wrote:It's very hard to see the NCAA giving 3 Pac-10 teams regional hosting bids while there are other highly ranked schools that would help spread out the Tournament instead of consolidating it on the West Coast.
As opposed to this:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source= ... 09&t=h&z=4

Re: Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 8:33 am
by nogerO
r2fireduck wrote:
greenyellow wrote:It's very hard to see the NCAA giving 3 Pac-10 teams regional hosting bids while there are other highly ranked schools that would help spread out the Tournament instead of consolidating it on the West Coast.
As opposed to this:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source= ... 09&t=h&z=4

East coast bias is pretty much entrenched in the NCAA especially SE Coast Bias...

Re: Ducks ranked #19 and #21

Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 9:58 am
by oregontrack
I would again disagree with that. If ESPN were doing the seeding, we'd be screwed. But the NCAA's seeding methods are based on mathematics and formulas, and if we're deserving of a regional hosting bid, we'll get one. Mens/womens basketball, softball, soccer... I can't really think of any past instances where 'East Coast Bias' came into play in an NCAA seeding committee.

Our biggest problems are twofold:

1. Our RPI is #23, and has been holding steady in the low 20s for a month and a half now. 16 teams get to host a regional. We won't move up considerably even by winning all of our remaining 4 games. Looking at the RPI rankings, the top 13 really look like locks to me, meaning there's about 15 teams fighting for 3 remaining hosting gigs, several of those teams in better positions than us.

2. Arizona. Zona has a better RPI than us, and won the season series. We NEED Oregon State to win the series against them this weekend, and we might need to sweep. That would put us #3 in the Pac-10 in terms of RPI ranking, and that might just be enough to jump over some teams with better RPIs. If Arizona wins the series and stays ahead of us, we're probably SOL.