97 PFs
Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
97 PFs
Tim Duncan B C- C B- B- A (Restricted to post)
In contrast to contemporary prep-to-pro players like KG, Jermaine O’Neal and TMac, Duncan stayed in college for all four years. During that period, he was a two-time ACC Player of the Year and a three-time NABC Defensive Player of the Year. By his sophomore year, he was considered a top five pick. Ready now player with room to grow. Great shot blocker. Amazing rebounder. Offensively, great mid range game. Nicknamed the Big Fundamental due to being an all around player. Amazing potential
Keith Van Horn C+ B- C C+ B- A (Restricted to post)
Van Horn is multi-talented and stands out on both ends of the floor. Great jumper. On the defensive end he can change the game with his length in the lane. He’s quick off his feet and covers ground well. His skill set makes him better suited for playing outside style; scouts could see him playing the center position. Amazing raw potential
Danny Fortson C+ D D C+ C+ A
He’s got a strong build and a overall nice level frame and all the athleticism in the world. Fortson can handle the perimeter and make plays for himself and for teammates but he’s also a force in the paint, a solid rebounder and and strong defensive presence. Amazing raw potential
Austin Croshere C+ B- C B- C+ B
A sweet shooting big with good size. Plays a complete game but is especially dangerous from 3pt land. May be better suited for the small forward position. Good potential
Maurice Taylor B- C- D+ B- C+ B
Mo is an intriguing athlete who flashes big upside. He can play on the wing or bang in the paint and he looks the part of any mid level tier prospect. Good potential
Jerald Honeycutt C+ C D+ B- B- B
Jack of all trades defender who can guard anywhere on the court while also being able to create turnovers. He is just average at everything but with any growth, he can become a very good defensive option. Good potential.
Gordon Malone C+ C C C+ C+ B
Undersized PF who moves quicker than most for his position but lacks technique needed to become elite. Good attacker but needs to improve. Average defender and rebounder. Good potential.
Dejan Tomašević C+ D D C+ B A
Top rebounder in the Euro league so his rebounding skills will translate well but needs to improve his offense and defense to become a more complete player. Great potential.
Chris Crawford C+ B C- B C C
Great jump shooter but needs to improve finishing in the post and extending beyond the three point line. Moves smoothly and is quicker than other PF’s but lacks strength to hang in the post. Good defender. Average potential.
In contrast to contemporary prep-to-pro players like KG, Jermaine O’Neal and TMac, Duncan stayed in college for all four years. During that period, he was a two-time ACC Player of the Year and a three-time NABC Defensive Player of the Year. By his sophomore year, he was considered a top five pick. Ready now player with room to grow. Great shot blocker. Amazing rebounder. Offensively, great mid range game. Nicknamed the Big Fundamental due to being an all around player. Amazing potential
Keith Van Horn C+ B- C C+ B- A (Restricted to post)
Van Horn is multi-talented and stands out on both ends of the floor. Great jumper. On the defensive end he can change the game with his length in the lane. He’s quick off his feet and covers ground well. His skill set makes him better suited for playing outside style; scouts could see him playing the center position. Amazing raw potential
Danny Fortson C+ D D C+ C+ A
He’s got a strong build and a overall nice level frame and all the athleticism in the world. Fortson can handle the perimeter and make plays for himself and for teammates but he’s also a force in the paint, a solid rebounder and and strong defensive presence. Amazing raw potential
Austin Croshere C+ B- C B- C+ B
A sweet shooting big with good size. Plays a complete game but is especially dangerous from 3pt land. May be better suited for the small forward position. Good potential
Maurice Taylor B- C- D+ B- C+ B
Mo is an intriguing athlete who flashes big upside. He can play on the wing or bang in the paint and he looks the part of any mid level tier prospect. Good potential
Jerald Honeycutt C+ C D+ B- B- B
Jack of all trades defender who can guard anywhere on the court while also being able to create turnovers. He is just average at everything but with any growth, he can become a very good defensive option. Good potential.
Gordon Malone C+ C C C+ C+ B
Undersized PF who moves quicker than most for his position but lacks technique needed to become elite. Good attacker but needs to improve. Average defender and rebounder. Good potential.
Dejan Tomašević C+ D D C+ B A
Top rebounder in the Euro league so his rebounding skills will translate well but needs to improve his offense and defense to become a more complete player. Great potential.
Chris Crawford C+ B C- B C C
Great jump shooter but needs to improve finishing in the post and extending beyond the three point line. Moves smoothly and is quicker than other PF’s but lacks strength to hang in the post. Good defender. Average potential.
- pistolpetejr
- Senior
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:48 pm
- GM: Los Angeles Clippers
Re: 97 PFs
KVH - do his notes mean he can play SF but only in an outside offense? Sorry, confused by the “Restricted to post” caveat in tandem with the notes.
---
PistolPeteJR
PistolPeteJR
- Craig
- Senior
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:16 pm
- GM: Phoenix Suns GM
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 97 PFs
Yeah Ownage makes final restrictions. Sometimes I make guys restricted because they simmed so well. Pippen for instance simmed amazing as a SG and when you do multiple sims seasons u can’t control the depth charts.pistolpetejr wrote:KVH - do his notes mean he can play SF but only in an outside offense? Sorry, confused by the “Restricted to post” caveat in tandem with the notes.
- Zyme
- All Pac-12
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
- GM: New York Knicks GM
Re: 97 PFs
God can you imagine if Duncan was SF eligible, he would break this engine.
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: 97 PFs
KVH would be a lot more attractive if he was SF eligible.
- jibbajabba614
- Senior
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 6:32 pm
- GM: Milwaukee Bucks GM
Re: 97 PFs
Honestly I would of liked them to be SF eligible. Would of made top 3 tough and top 6 tough.
Really deep draft
Really deep draft
- Oregon Ownage
- All-American
- Posts: 15300
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
- GM: Dallas Mavericks
- Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Re: 97 PFs
Trying to limit game breaking players who can play down at SF. Looking to have more natural SF being starters there rather than converted down PFslukeyrid13 wrote:KVH would be a lot more attractive if he was SF eligible.
- lukeyrid13
- All-American
- Posts: 10484
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
- GM: Portland TrailBlazers
Re: 97 PFs
Yeah I totally understand the reasoning for itOregon Ownage wrote:Trying to limit game breaking players who can play down at SF. Looking to have more natural SF being starters there rather than converted down PFslukeyrid13 wrote:KVH would be a lot more attractive if he was SF eligible.
In 1.0 we had Dennis Rodman getting 13 rebounds a game at SF and Karl Malone getting like 22/11. I had Robert Horry who got like 4 blocks a game predominantly at SF. So I totally get not wanting guys who can take advantage of playing down.