Statistical rankings of Pac 10

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
User avatar
duckduckgoose
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:45 pm

Statistical rankings of Pac 10

Post by duckduckgoose »

Found this website listed on the 1 click Ducks page. It has some good stats about the Pac 10 over the last 4 years. Interesting reading. Sorry if it has been posted and I missed it.
http://leftyloon.blogspot.com/2009/04/p ... -2008.html
User avatar
VinnyKnuckles
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Oregon
Contact:

Re: Statistical rankings of Pac 10

Post by VinnyKnuckles »

Nice link.
Image
gofightingducks
All Pac-12
Posts: 5533
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:08 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Statistical rankings of Pac 10

Post by gofightingducks »

How about Oregon #1 in offense the last 3 years now if only NA and the defense can step it up #2 in 05 and 06 but #6 and #7 the last two years. Oregon's defense is the one thing holding them back from being a Rose Bowl and NC contender.
duckgrad99
All Pac-12
Posts: 6086
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Statistical rankings of Pac 10

Post by duckgrad99 »

gofightingducks wrote:How about Oregon #1 in offense the last 3 years now if only NA and the defense can step it up #2 in 05 and 06 but #6 and #7 the last two years. Oregon's defense is the one thing holding them back from being a Rose Bowl and NC contender.




Bingo, and I think that's why a lot of us are so hard on Allioti.
Image
Legions
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:45 pm

Re: Statistical rankings of Pac 10

Post by Legions »

If anything that site shows the strain that is put on the Oregon D. 05 and 06 the D was great, but as soon as Kelly came, the defense fell to 6 or 7. The defense is lagging behind because it wasn't build to be on the field an extra 10-15 minutes a game. This season the D should be a little faster and more prepared.
User avatar
duckduckgoose
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1117
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:45 pm

Re: Statistical rankings of Pac 10

Post by duckduckgoose »

Legions wrote:If anything that site shows the strain that is put on the Oregon D. 05 and 06 the D was great, but as soon as Kelly came, the defense fell to 6 or 7. The defense is lagging behind because it wasn't build to be on the field an extra 10-15 minutes a game. This season the D should be a little faster and more prepared.
Thanks Legion, that is the point I was trying to make when I posted the link. I really think that yards per game is a terrible metric for determining who is a good defense. I really don't think that Aliotti is a great coordinator, but I think that he gets a bum rap on most of the websites.
Legions
Two Star Recruit
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:45 pm

Re: Statistical rankings of Pac 10

Post by Legions »

duckduckgoose wrote:Thanks Legion, that is the point I was trying to make when I posted the link. I really think that yards per game is a terrible metric for determining who is a good defense. I really don't think that Aliotti is a great coordinator, but I think that he gets a bum rap on most of the websites.
Exactly, he may not be the best D-coordinator but he's a lot better than people seem to think.
Post Reply