Pac-12 not dead yet

Moderators: greenyellow, UOducksTK1

User avatar
pezsez1
All Pac-12
Posts: 6266
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: RIP CITY

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by pezsez1 »

Bad week for the Pac. I still think the new Pac is clearly better than the new MW, but just a really bad look to get outmaneuvered. Nothing that happened this week did anything to help OSU or WSU regain their lost relevance.
Willie Taggart is a dick.
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by greenyellow »

The Pac-12's biggest mistake was trying to bite off chunks of the MWC in two different batches. They should have gone after the AAC schools first and then moved onto the MWC, which wouldn't have allowed the MWC to come up with the plan to keep 7 teams around.
Image
User avatar
StevensTechU
All Pac-12
Posts: 7116
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:25 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by StevensTechU »

Really botched this. I like the idea of a 'premiere' G5 conference that has limited separation from the Big 12, and now we end up with a heaping mess.
buckmarkduck
All-American
Posts: 11000
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:22 am
Contact:

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by buckmarkduck »

The big 2 are already maneuvering to be the only voices that matter. The fact that these 2 schools still think there will be anything other than 2 conferences the shots, boggles my mind.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/101 ... ormat-more


What I also don’t understand, they went and got Gonzaga, smart in my opinion. Why not also go get Grand Canyon, St. Mary’s and Creighton. Become a solid basketball conference?
User avatar
greenyellow
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39212
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by greenyellow »

They don't have Gonzaga yet.
Image
User avatar
Phalanx
Senior
Posts: 4948
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Pac-12 not dead yet

Post by Phalanx »

This whole thing is dumb. They obviously had no plan other than to go back on their word to the very conference that threw them a scheduling lifeline. The only way keeping the Pac 12 alive makes sense is if they had some hope of getting Stanford and Cal back, but adding Fresneck and Boise killed that anyway. They should have just joined the Mountain West in 2 years and kept the Pac 12 money.
Post Reply