Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Moderators: greenyellow, Autzenoise, UOducksTK1

Post Reply
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12821
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by woundedknees »

Poor Dawg fans...

Just because LSU happens to trip up in their scheduling, and accidentally play a decent OOC team on the road on occasion (It happens what, every other year, at most?), doesn't make the Montlake MudPuppies significant, relevant, or mean that the FlushPuppies have a snowball's chance of becoming that in the foreseeable future...

Surely, the Tigers wouldn't deliberately waste the time, money, and sleep deprivation necessary to travel this far to take a chance on getting embarrassed, especially on national TV, do you ?

Heck, once they figured out the Beavs were only a field goal (Or 3 PATs) away from beating them in their own house, LSU has never shown an interest in travelling to CornValley, where 13 fans and a distracted sheep in the stands constitutes too much of a 'homefield advantage' for the risk to be worth it.
Last edited by woundedknees on Tue May 05, 2009 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
User avatar
VinnyKnuckles
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Oregon
Contact:

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarilly!

Post by VinnyKnuckles »

I doubt the Dawgs keep that game within 3 touchdowns. It will be quite the shock to Jake of Nazareth's system when he finds himself facing LSU's first-string defense, after practicing against the likes of Tripper Johnson and the other assorted stiffs the Huskies have running around in their secondary.
Image
Destroyer77
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:49 pm

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarilly!

Post by Destroyer77 »

VinnyKnuckles wrote:I doubt the Dawgs keep that game within 3 touchdowns. It will be quite the shock to Jake of Nazareth's system when he finds himself facing LSU's first-string defense, after practicing against the likes of Tripper Johnson and the other assorted stiffs the Huskies have running around in their secondary.
hahaha, "Jake of Nazareth".... made my day!
BisonDucks
Three Star Recruit
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by BisonDucks »

Jake was 18-20 in their spring game...better watch out!
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12821
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by woundedknees »

18/20 against the UW 2's and 3's... And we have seen how good the UW 1's were last year.

I will believe Jeezus of the Lakeside has become a QB when it is shown against real competition.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
User avatar
spinseeker
Freshman
Posts: 1391
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:32 am
Location: Springfield
Contact:

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by spinseeker »

Correction - 16-18 and two dropped passes.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/h ... wfb26.html

Really, though, who wouldn't want to see LSU get beat by Washington. I hope UW gets two wins this season. LSU and ND. The SEC's godlike preseason status really bothers me. :x Wasn't Auburn top ten last season? And Tennessee top 25? :roll: How ridiculous did that look three weeks in to the season, much less at the end of the season?
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12821
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by woundedknees »

If the Messiah of Montlake completes 16/18 against LSU, it would make for entertaining TV... I just don't seriously believe it's possible.
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
freedjr
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 979
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:23 am

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by freedjr »

As much as I would like to say huck the fuskies, how great would it be if the Pac-10's worst team beat one of the SEC's better teams?
woundedknees
All-American
Posts: 12821
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:06 pm

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by woundedknees »

:roll: Image :lol:Image
Autzen Stadium... Where great teams go to die...Hard!

Image
User avatar
ncduck
Senior
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by ncduck »

It would be awesome! As long as it's the only game of the year they win.
jhopduck
Five Star Recruit
Posts: 1161
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:53 am
Location: Medford, OR

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by jhopduck »

Yeah 18/20 against UW's D, that's like having Masoli throw against all freshman walk on's for us. Wouldn't even be fair. Although Jake is a talented individual.
Twitter: @JHopkins541

Email: duckterritoryjustin@gmail.com
goducks75
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Tigard/Eugene

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarilly!

Post by goducks75 »

VinnyKnuckles wrote:I doubt the Dawgs keep that game within 3 touchdowns. It will be quite the shock to Jake of Nazareth's system when he finds himself facing LSU's first-string defense, after practicing against the likes of Tripper Johnson and the other assorted stiffs the Huskies have running around in their secondary.
Hey now it's the Messiah of Montlake. Get it right :lol:
goducks75
Four Star Recruit
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Tigard/Eugene

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by goducks75 »

freedjr wrote:As much as I would like to say huck the fuskies, how great would it be if the Pac-10's worst team beat one of the SEC's better teams?
That'd be awesome as much as it pains me to admit it. It'd shut up all those SEC clowns.
User avatar
spinseeker
Freshman
Posts: 1391
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:32 am
Location: Springfield
Contact:

Re: Scheduling = Relevance? Not necessarily!

Post by spinseeker »

:lol: The media will have three weeks to talk about how much improved UW has become and how great they actually are. Then they will get creamed in the Pac 10 and you won't hear much more about that loss for LSU except for excuses as they roll an easy SEC and climb up the polls.
Post Reply