Preseason Results

You can talk about all sim related stuff here.

Moderators: UOducksTK1, Zyme, lukeyrid13, Oregon Ownage

User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Preseason Results

Post by lukeyrid13 »

pudgejeff wrote:
Zyme wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:
Zyme wrote:
But lordy my division sucks
East has gotten a lot worse in the last year.
The training camp killed some of us. Still have no idea how young teams with plenty of potential have largely negative TCs. Makes zero sense.
Ya it seemed weird, lots of guys 28-33 improving too.
It has to do with the pot of the later players being all over teh place. As the league move on, it wil even out. Like Moses malone looks the same so he had decent pot, meaning he's sticking around for a year or more yet. Only the rookie classes coming in, will there be more predicable progression. Sometime crazy stuff happen, but it is more predictable.
Wish I'd have know that before filling my team with rookies who were 1st round picks in the 88 draft lol.
You could easily move all the assets you have to try and start winning at any time though.
User avatar
pudgejeff
All Pac-12
Posts: 5014
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Preseason Results

Post by pudgejeff »

lukeyrid13 wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
Zyme wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote: East has gotten a lot worse in the last year.
The training camp killed some of us. Still have no idea how young teams with plenty of potential have largely negative TCs. Makes zero sense.
Ya it seemed weird, lots of guys 28-33 improving too.
It has to do with the pot of the later players being all over teh place. As the league move on, it wil even out. Like Moses malone looks the same so he had decent pot, meaning he's sticking around for a year or more yet. Only the rookie classes coming in, will there be more predicable progression. Sometime crazy stuff happen, but it is more predictable.
Wish I'd have know that before filling my team with rookies who were 1st round picks in the 88 draft lol.
You could easily move all the assets you have to try and start winning at any time though.
I don't see how that has any relevance?
dthomas=ddixon
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8598
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: Preseason Results

Post by dthomas=ddixon »

pudgejeff wrote:
Zyme wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:
Zyme wrote:
But lordy my division sucks
East has gotten a lot worse in the last year.
The training camp killed some of us. Still have no idea how young teams with plenty of potential have largely negative TCs. Makes zero sense.
Ya it seemed weird, lots of guys 28-33 improving too.
It has to do with the pot of the later players being all over teh place. As the league move on, it wil even out. Like Moses malone looks the same so he had decent pot, meaning he's sticking around for a year or more yet. Only the rookie classes coming in, will there be more predicable progression. Sometime crazy stuff happen, but it is more predictable.
Wish I'd have know that before filling my team with rookies who were 1st round picks in the 88 draft lol.
No kidding, would have been nice to know my young guys with good potential would all get worse and have their potential drop as well.
Image
User avatar
FlDuckFan
All Pac-12
Posts: 5068
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:45 am
GM: Orlando Magic GM
Location: Florida

Re: Preseason Results

Post by FlDuckFan »

dthomas=ddixon wrote:
No kidding, would have been nice to know my young guys with good potential would all get worse and have their potential drop as well.
This is the one that got me .
bellsduck
Senior
Posts: 3811
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:40 am
GM: Utah Jazz

Re: Preseason Results

Post by bellsduck »

9-3 = 2nd best record overall.
Wow! Is everyone tanking again?
cordy02c
Senior
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:38 pm

Re: Preseason Results

Post by cordy02c »

play like that in the regular season and it may be time for a firesale
Brophdog88
Senior
Posts: 3114
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
GM: Denver Nuggets

Re: Preseason Results

Post by Brophdog88 »

thats the problem with creation drafts, potentials tend to be scattered...normal drafts will be much more predictable
Denver Nuggets DASL GM
User avatar
lukeyrid13
All-American
Posts: 10475
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:58 am
GM: Portland TrailBlazers

Re: Preseason Results

Post by lukeyrid13 »

pudgejeff wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
Zyme wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
dthomas=ddixon wrote: The training camp killed some of us. Still have no idea how young teams with plenty of potential have largely negative TCs. Makes zero sense.
Ya it seemed weird, lots of guys 28-33 improving too.
It has to do with the pot of the later players being all over teh place. As the league move on, it wil even out. Like Moses malone looks the same so he had decent pot, meaning he's sticking around for a year or more yet. Only the rookie classes coming in, will there be more predicable progression. Sometime crazy stuff happen, but it is more predictable.
Wish I'd have know that before filling my team with rookies who were 1st round picks in the 88 draft lol.
You could easily move all the assets you have to try and start winning at any time though.
I don't see how that has any relevance?
Even though they didn't improve as much as you'd like you still have a lot of players with good value.
User avatar
pudgejeff
All Pac-12
Posts: 5014
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Preseason Results

Post by pudgejeff »

lukeyrid13 wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
lukeyrid13 wrote:
pudgejeff wrote:
Zyme wrote:
pudgejeff wrote: Ya it seemed weird, lots of guys 28-33 improving too.
It has to do with the pot of the later players being all over teh place. As the league move on, it wil even out. Like Moses malone looks the same so he had decent pot, meaning he's sticking around for a year or more yet. Only the rookie classes coming in, will there be more predicable progression. Sometime crazy stuff happen, but it is more predictable.
Wish I'd have know that before filling my team with rookies who were 1st round picks in the 88 draft lol.
You could easily move all the assets you have to try and start winning at any time though.
I don't see how that has any relevance?
Even though they didn't improve as much as you'd like you still have a lot of players with good value.
Unless I'm mistaken with my evaluations I have 5 guys of value and 2 of them were signed in FA and one was my lottery pick this year. All the other rookies I filled my team with seem to have no value at all.
Bundybastard
One Star Recruit
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:35 pm

Re: Preseason Results

Post by Bundybastard »

Nice to get some perspective on these players

Now to reply to them PMs
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40520
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Preseason Results

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Brophdog88 wrote:thats the problem with creation drafts, potentials tend to be scattered...normal drafts will be much more predictable
This. Plus I usually spend weeks on a league file and try to tweak everything to be as accurate as possible. I probably spent like a few hours on this file in total. So I take responsibility for that, but in 2 years, everything will be as it should and should be consistent.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
User avatar
Oregon Ownage
All-American
Posts: 15301
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:40 am
GM: Dallas Mavericks
Location: Hampton Roads, Virginia

Re: Preseason Results

Post by Oregon Ownage »

I have no problem with the potentials and how players grow or decrease. If it was straight forward then someone could just pick A potential players and just ride them each year. Thats what I like about the sim, you do not know what player will grow or regress. Its a crap shoot as it is in real life.
Image
User avatar
Zyme
All Pac-12
Posts: 5579
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:35 pm
GM: New York Knicks GM

Re: Preseason Results

Post by Zyme »

Oregon Ownage wrote:I have no problem with the potentials and how players grow or decrease. If it was straight forward then someone could just pick A potential players and just ride them each year. Thats what I like about the sim, you do not know what player will grow or regress. Its a crap shoot as it is in real life.
The fun part is that potential letter is only a reflection of the players' true potential. It usually settles around year 3-4 but you could have a player with 100 shown pot (max A), and only 50 true pot
DASL1 Rings: '93, '94

K's HOF:
Mark "Wholly Mammoth" Eaton | Retired 2002, age 44: 24 min/8pts/8reb/1stl/2.5 blks/1 TO
Michael "Sweet Home" Ansley | Retired 2007, age 42: 33 min/16pts/8 reb/1.5stl/.5 blks/.5 TO Lifetime .550 shooting %
Gheorghe "Ghiţă (Ghitza, Little George)" Mureșan | Retired 2008, age 36: 35Min/16.2pt/12.2reb/2.1ast/1.6stl/2.9blk/1.3TO (.461/.715/.000)
User avatar
pudgejeff
All Pac-12
Posts: 5014
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:21 am
GM: Sacramento Kings GM

Re: Preseason Results

Post by pudgejeff »

My favorite result of the Pre-season:

Dino Radja PF 32 8 9 0 0 0 0 12 4 2 2 2 3 16
Charles Barkley PF 40 6 16 0 0 0 2 16 4 2 0 3 1 12

Dino going toe to toe with Sir Charles and holding him in check in a 29 point win.
User avatar
UOducksTK1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 40520
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:28 pm
GM: Boston Celtics GM
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Preseason Results

Post by UOducksTK1 »

Oregon Ownage wrote:I have no problem with the potentials and how players grow or decrease. If it was straight forward then someone could just pick A potential players and just ride them each year. Thats what I like about the sim, you do not know what player will grow or regress. Its a crap shoot as it is in real life.
Oh totally. I've seen players with ratings of C+ C+ C C+ C A and 100 potential, where I test simmed them 10 times, would end up B A- C+ A- C C. But then when it came to the actual sim, he ended up like B- B- C B+ C.

Nothing's for certain, but at the same time, if you have a high level of skill beyond taking advantage of newer GMs, you can pretty consistently do well in sims.

So if you're good, you'll still win. But not everything goes by the book, just like real life.

Do Not Fear. Isaiah 41:13
Post Reply